Imputation — when to use mean vs median vs mode vs KNN vs MICE
Missing values are NOT a 'fill with mean' problem. Different imputation strategies for different situations. Know when to use each.
The output will appear here.
5 imputation strategies — pick based on the DATA: MEAN — for normal distributions (age, height). Pulled by outliers. MEDIAN — for skewed distributions (income, prices). Robust to outliers. MODE (most_frequent) — for categorical (city, color). The only option for categories. KNN — uses correlation. A 25-year-old's missing income = average of 5 similar 25-year-olds. More accurate but O(n²) — slow on large data. MICE (IterativeImputer) — trains a model per column to predict missing values from others. Most sophisticated. Best for complex patterns. Slowest. THREE missingness types you should know: MCAR (Missing Completely At Random) — safe to impute. MAR (Missing At Random) — depends on other features (KNN/MICE help). MNAR (Missing Not At Random) — depends on the missing value itself (rich hide income). Hardest.
-
Change income strategy from 'median' to 'mean'→ mean is pulled up by billionaires — bad for skewed data -
Change KNN n_neighbors from 5 to 20→ more neighbors = smoother but less specific imputation -
Add a constant imputer: SimpleImputer(strategy='constant', fill_value=-999)→ marks missing as a separate value (good for tree models) -
Add strategy='constant' fill_value='Unknown' for city→ treats missing as its own category